Profil Kreativitas Dan Kemampuan Dasar Bekerja Ilmiah (KDBI) Peserta Didik Dalam Pembelajaran IPAS Di SMK Bhakti Mulia Wonogiri

Hindradi Hindradi; Fenny Roshayanti; Nur Khoiri; Muhammad Syaipul Hayat

doi:10.51874/jips.v5i2.251

Authors

Hindradi Hindradi Pendidikan Ilmu Pengetahuan Alam (IPA), Pascasarjana, Universitas PGRI Semarang
Fenny Roshayanti Pendidikan Ilmu Pengetahuan Alam (IPA), Pascasarjana, Universitas PGRI Semarang
Nur Khoiri Pendidikan Ilmu Pengetahuan Alam (IPA), Pascasarjana, Universitas PGRI Semarang
Muhammad Syaipul Hayat Pendidikan Ilmu Pengetahuan Alam (IPA), Pascasarjana, Universitas PGRI Semarang

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.51874/jips.v5i2.251

Keywords:

profil kreativitas, kemampuan dasar, jemampuan dasar bekerja ilmiah, bekerja ilmiah, pembelajaran IPAS

Abstract

The potential of students that can be developed in facing 21st century learning includes creativity and basic scientific thinking abilities, but in reality the level of creativity and KDBI (Basic Scientific Working Ability) of students in science and science learning at Bhakti Mulia Wonogiri Vocational School is relatively low. This research aims to determine the extent of creativity and basic scientific work skills in class This research is quantitative descriptive research with non-test data collection techniques using questionnaires. The research was conducted with students filling out a 35-question questionnaire with details of 20 creativity questions and 15 KDBI questions. Each indicator consists of 5 questions on the questionnaire. The research results show that the indicator of fluency in creativity is 54.29% in the less creative category, the indicator of flexibility in creativity is 53.93% in the less creative category, the indicator of authenticity in creativity is 54.64% in the less creative category, the indicator detail in creativity was 54.82%, including the less creative category, and for the Process indicator in KDBI it was 55.71%, it was in the poor category, the knowledge indicator in KDBI was 59.11%, it was in the quite good category and the attitude indicator in KDBI was 54, 46% are in the poor category. It can be concluded that the average indicator of creativity of Bhakti Mulia Wonogiri Vocational School students is 54.42% so it is on average less creative, while the KDBI of 56.42% is in the fairly good average category. Based on this research, the Bhakti Mulia Vonogiri Vocational School needs to carry out learning using the Project based learning method which can increase students' creativity and KDBI.

References

Arikunto, S. (2010). Metode peneltian. Jakarta: Rineka Cipta, 173.

Erdoğan, V. (2019). Integrating 4C skills of 21st century into 4 language skills in EFL classes. International Journal of Education and Research, 7(11), 113–124.

Greenstein, L. M. (2012). Assessing 21st century skills: A guide to evaluating mastery and authentic learning. Corwin Press.

Handriani, N., & Subhan, M. (2020). Hubungan kecerdasan intelektual kecerdasan emosional dan kecerdasan spiritual terhadap prestasi belajar fisika. Gravity Edu: Jurnal Pembelajaran Dan Pengajaran Fisika, 3(1), 1–4.

Hasibuan, A. T., & Prastowo, A. (2019). Konsep pendidikan abad 21: kepemimpinan dan pengembangan sumber daya manusia sd/mi. MAGISTRA: Media Pengembangan Ilmu Pendidikan Dasar Dan Keislaman, 10(1).

Hidayat, P. W., & Widjajanti, D. B. (2018). Analisis kemampuan berpikir kreatif dan minat belajar siswa dalam mengerjakan soal open ended dengan pendekatan CTL. Phytagoras: Jurnal Pendidikan Matematika, 13.

Latifah, L. (2013). Metode Diskusi Kelompok Berbasis Inquiriuntuk Meningkatkan Hasil Belajar Fisika Di Sma. Jurnal Ilmiah Guru Caraka Olah Pikir Edukatif, (1).

Marzal, S., González-Medina, R., Salas-Puente, R., Garcerá, G., & Figueres, E. (2019). An embedded internet of energy communication platform for the future smart microgrids management. IEEE Internet of Things Journal, 6(4), 7241–7252.

Mu’minah, I. H., & Suryaningsih, Y. (2020). Implementation of Steam (Science, Technology, Engineering, Art and Mathematics) in 21st Century Learning. Bio Educatio.

Murti, K., Kresnadi, H., & Halidjah, S. (2023). Pengembangan Modul Ajar Mata Pelajaran Ilmu Pengetahuan Alam dan Sosial (IPAS) Kelas IV Kurikulum Merdeka Materi Indonesiaku Kaya Budaya di SDN 24 Pontianak Timur. Journal on Education, 6(1), 6801–6808.

Nofianti, L. Q., & Lahamid, Q. (2017). Metode Penelitian Survey. Fakultas Ekonomi Dan Ilmu Sosial UIN Suska Riau.

Puspitasari, J. F., Patonah, S., & Sukamto, S. (2024). Pengembangan Modul Ajar IPAS Berbasis STEM untuk Mewujudkan Keterampilan Dasar Berpikir Ilmiah Siswa Sekolah Dasar. Jurnal Basicedu, 8(2), 1235–1245.

Rahayu, R., Rosita, R., Rahayuningsih, Y. S., Hernawan, A. H., & Prihantini, P. (2022). Implementasi kurikulum merdeka belajar di sekolah penggerak. Jurnal Basicedu, 6(4), 6313–6319.

Rustaman, N Y, Arifin, M., & Permanasari, A. (2007). Mengefektifkan Pembelajaran Sains dan Animasinya untuk Mengembangkan Kemampuan Dasar Bekerja Ilmiah dengan Berbagai Metode. Laporan Penelitian Hibah Pasca, Didanai DP2M Ditjen Dikti.

Rustaman, Nuryani Y. (2005). Perkembangan penelitian pembelajaran berbasis inkuiri dalam pendidikan sains. In Makalah dipresentasikan dalam Seminar Nasional II Himpunan Ikatan Sarjada dan Pemerhati Pendidikan IPA Idonesia Bekerjasama dengan FPMIPA. Universitas Pendidikan Indonesia, Bandung (pp. 22–23).

Safaria, S. A., & Sangila, M. S. (2018). Kemampuan berpikir kreatif matematis siswa SMP Negeri 9 Kendari pada materi bangun datar. Jurnal Al-Ta’dib, 11(2), 73–90.

Shofiyah, N. (2015). Deskripsi literasi sains awal mahasiswa pendidikan IPA pada konsep IPA. PEDAGOGIA: Jurnal Pendidikan, 4(2), 113–120.

Sugianto, S., Hayati, F., & Junitasari, J. (2018). Analisis Kemampuan Berpikir Kreatif Matematis Siswa SMP pada Materi Persamaan Garis Lurus. Jurnal Pendidikan Tambusai, 2(3), 1678–1686.

Trilling, B., & Hood, P. (1999). Learning, technology, and education reform in the knowledge age or" we’re wired, webbed, and windowed, now what?". Educational Technology, 5–18.

Widarti, R., & Roshayanti, F. (2021). Potensi Implementasi STEAM (Science, Technology, Engineering, Art and Mathematic) berorientasi ESD (Education for Sustainable Development) dalam Pembelajaran Fluida. UPEJ Unnes Physics Education Journal, 10(3), 290–295.